Hi Everybody,
How have you been? And what's been the latest at your end? Well, lot's been happening in India particularly which has caught the shock and awe of the world and has even been heralded as the so called 'second freedom struggle'!!! The other day, I was visiting a friend and we happened to get talking on the wave of anti-corruption that had swept our country, the repercussions,the possible resolution on the issue or the possible backlash it could have if the situation was not salvaged in time.

Well, if the latter wouldn't have happened I would have just focused on what was the need of the hour as citizens of the country. But another point I would also like to address in this month's blog is the need to be civil and tolerant to accommodate newer or even diverse views to enrich our understanding and get a better perspective on people, issues and things.
The case of the gentleman's unruly behaviour might have been just one random case but the aggression demonstrated by the crowds at the Ram Leela grounds or in the panel debates held on different national television channels and the manner in which youngsters in particular out rightly refused to understand the legal framework and procedures of drafting laws in our country and how meekly even believed that it was a cakewalk to implement it within days was astonishing to say the least! And this came as a rude shock since Anna Hazare's team comprise of some eminent judges, lawyers and ex-police officials in its core group!!



During our freedom struggle,Gandhiji, the father of our nation united people on the 'idea' of independence on what it entailed towards nation-building, the duties and responsibilities that came along with it and thus spake a unified voice of freedom. It took us over a hundred years to attain freedom because we were not prepared and attuned to the idea of freedom.

Few paragraphs earlier you might have been wondering that if all went by my analogy of things then laws to deal with crime would not have existed! But the point here is that we do need laws to deal with crime because crime is driven by a motive which could be revenge, anger, circumstances or an unstable mind; but what could be the greatest motive for corruption to succeed if it were not driven by greed and dishonesty? So, as I look at it, I believe that corruption is more of a ethical issue and a moral crisis.
Now here’s another systemic change which will could help checking corruption is the government’s initiative on introducing the Unique Identity Authority of India (UIDAI) that deals with the problem from the root rather than let it flourish! The UIDAI is just like a citizen’s social security number which they have in America. The salient features of UIDAI are –
· It would help address the rigged state elections;
· Widespread embezzlement that affect subsidies and poverty alleviation programs
· Address illegal immigration into India and terrorist threats (To read more on this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_Identification_Authority_of_India#Salient_features_of_AADHAAR)
· It would help address the rigged state elections;
· Widespread embezzlement that affect subsidies and poverty alleviation programs
· Address illegal immigration into India and terrorist threats (To read more on this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_Identification_Authority_of_India#Salient_features_of_AADHAAR)
So, that’s what I’d call is innovation….see one initiative deals with so many problems rather than enacting one law that alters the face of the constitution!

Talk about enacting laws; I do hope they consider that voting is made compulsory with due mechanisms in place after all once in five years we have an opportunity rebuild our nation once again by using our power of reasoning, clarity and understanding while exercising our franchise intelligently and reinstating the right government in place…so the power of change lies within you!
Here’s your food for thought as I leave you on this note in this month's blog post. Take care and ciao until next month.
Love,
Sonyaa
Love,
Sonyaa
2 comments:
If politucal parties agreed to a strong lokpal bill,there would not be such noise. In my view what ever happened is within the system. Pulling it out of the box doesnot make it alien. comparing it as a threat to democrasy is foolish. People say its anarchy.. Anarchy is always there ,just beneath democracy. When politicians loose their credibility ,its the fear of anarchy that keep powerful legislature on toes. Thats how democrasy is justified,otherwise with si many politicians from v few familes ruling the nation, it looks more like aristocracy!!.. What ever happened is good. Fir me its as important as freedom struggle.
Its time for politicians to realize their monopoly over fooling people is over. This movement showed it to them. Any one in this country can fool the nation by bringing little commonolity. For them it was caste and region,for him(ANNA) it was corruption. This movement brought the politucians to same level of common man. I
It was nice to have your view on our blog. And I would also like to express my opinion on the same. Firstly, it is systemic changes that are needed and not cosmetic,it all sounds very nice,after all there's no end to drafting laws in our country; we could have laws for endless issues. It is a known fact that the draft of the Jan Lok Pal bill has undergone several changes be it bringing the judiciary, members of parliament and sundry; so it has been toned down so that it fits within the framework of our constitution. The point we are missing here is that the panel who will be appointed in the Lok Pal bill are also humans and there's no rubber stamp to prove that they are incorruptible.So tomorrow if one member is found fallible then we would demand the government to create yet another law to monitor their accountability as well just as the judiciary would soon be having an accountability and standards bill introduced in the parliament. So instead of creating newer governing bodies, I am of the opinion that there could be electoral reforms instead whereby those contesting elections should not have any criminal or nefarious background (which of course could be clearly defined if a reform to that effect were to be drafted).Now, this move would definitely be welcomed as it would sift the chaff from the wheat.But another pointer here is that the so called 'corrupt' politicians are voted time and again by us, so if there's anyone corrupter...it's us.Now, what you addressed as dynasty or 'aristocracy' politics, I am afraid that the Jan Lok Pal cannot by any stretch of imagination do anything on that. The answer is the so called 'aristocrats' referred by you are liked and hence voted by us...so there's really nothing wrong in that. Tomorrow if you believe you can capture the attention of the people, you represent the common sentiments of the people and think you can make a difference, people would vote for you.
Post a Comment